I open this thread to collect information about all the SFML bindings that exist, for the corresponding page on the new website.Authors of bindings for SFML may not browse the forum on a regular basis and miss this thread.
Info: Not active. I tested only basic things(and only on windows).Do you think it is worth mentioning? Is it something that can be useful to D programers, especially compared to the other D binding?
You can keep it on list until another user(http://en.sfml-dev.org/forums/index.php?topic=9387.msg74976#msg74976) finishes his binding.QuoteInfo: Not active. I tested only basic things(and only on windows).Do you think it is worth mentioning? Is it something that can be useful to D programers, especially compared to the other D binding?
Also I provided in the past tutorials for the SFML website (in the style of the Python tutorial) that never got introduced on the website.Hmm I don't remember, but I'm really sorry for that :-\
Please tell me if you want something for the next 2.0 websiteNo, now every binding is responsible for providing its own resources. I'll just keep the forums.
QuotePlease tell me if you want something for the next 2.0 websiteNo, now every binding is responsible for providing its own resources. I'll just keep the forums.
The very last version is not in the svn, it's a snapshot in the download directory.
On the website, clic on the link:
"other downloads (older and experimental)"
the most recent snapshot is currently:
ocaml-sfml-2.0RC-git-2012-10-09.tgz
but my local version is much more recent than that.
(I'll try to make a more recent snapshot soon(tm))
If we can help for the C++ API tutorials, please also tell about itThanks, but they are already finished ;)
I confirm for my bindings and if it hasn't been updated for 20 days, that's because I'm busy with other tasks related to it such porting other SFML-based library to make them compatible with the bindings.
:o So, what is still to be done before release?QuoteIf we can help for the C++ API tutorials, please also tell about itThanks, but they are already finished ;)
So, what is still to be done before release?The website.
I was maintaining two branches at a time, "master" based on SFML2-RC and "latest_sfml" based on the latest changes. Are you sure you were compiling the right branches. I admit my setup.py was sometimes outdated but most of the time it should have worked. I was using the latest Cython version too.I confirm for my bindings and if it hasn't been updated for 20 days, that's because I'm busy with other tasks related to it such porting other SFML-based library to make them compatible with the bindings.
When looking for python bindings I tried yours first, however after fixing two compile errors and encountering a third I decided to see what the pysfml-cython bindings had to offer. Those compiled almost effortlessly and work very well. Most (all?) of the issues seemed to be wrong assumptions about the SFML C++ API. I used SFML2 RC for both bindings.
I wanted to give you the heads up as your bindings seem more active and the documentation appears to be more polished. I could re-download and post specific compile errors if you wish, however as mentioned before they were all due to incorrect API usage. If there are multiple RC versions that could be the reason why please let me know, but I could only find one on the main SFML website.
Thank you,
Dave
Yes, please don't forget about me!I'll add you this evening ;)
the Java binding is "JSFML", not "jSFML"Fixed.
Yes, please don't forget about me!Done.
Name - DSFML
Language - D
Author - Jeremy DeHaan(dehaan.jeremiah@gmail.com)
Website - https://github.com/Jebbs/DSFML
The correct case for OCaml is OCaml (not Ocaml).Fixed.