SFML community forums

Help => General => Topic started by: toad1359 on October 18, 2013, 02:42:04 am

Title: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: toad1359 on October 18, 2013, 02:42:04 am
How would I go about setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++ 4.9.9.2? I downloaded the minGW package.
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: eXpl0it3r on October 18, 2013, 02:51:34 am
First you should upgrade Dev C++ to Orwell's version (http://orwelldevcpp.blogspot.ch/), which is somewhere at 5.5.1.

Next the setup will be very similar to the on with Code::Blocks, you'll just need to find the similar options. It's not that hard, just try it and if it doesn't work come back here. ;)
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: toad1359 on October 18, 2013, 02:57:30 am
Do I have to use Orwell's version or can I use 4.9.9.2?
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: eXpl0it3r on October 18, 2013, 03:00:47 am
The Bloodshed version (4.9.9.2) is outdated big time. It contains bugs, is not up-to-date with the latest C++ standards, misses other features, etc.
So yes you should definitely update!
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: Laurent on October 18, 2013, 07:57:22 am
Your question should not be "how do I set up SFML on Dev-C++", but rather "how do I set up a library with Dev-C++", and more generally "how do I use Dev-C++". This way you won't have to post on the forums of each other library that you may use in the future. Especially since you chose a dead IDE that nobody knows about anymore ;)
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: eXpl0it3r on October 18, 2013, 11:40:20 am
Especially since you chose a dead IDE that nobody knows about anymore ;)
The Orwell version is not really dead. ;)
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: Laurent on October 18, 2013, 11:50:50 am
But is it seriously used by today's developers?
Title: Re: Setting up SFML 2.1 on Dev-c++
Post by: eXpl0it3r on October 18, 2013, 12:03:44 pm
Probably not that much since everyone seems to hate Dev-C++ for some reason...
But unpopular software doesn't equal to unusable. I'm sure there's a handful of people using it. ;)