Messages

1

General / Re: Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 03:33:25 pm »

Oki. Thanks for your effort and time!

I will look if I have any driver than is not updated.

Thanks!
Pinkii

2

General / Re: Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 03:14:23 pm »

yup sorry 

http://pastebin.com/4eTPZiQf

I have tried to compile the sfml with the -g flag, but it doesn't show the line of the trace.

3

General / Re: Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 03:00:36 pm »

Care to provide the trace?

What I have to do to provide the trace? I dont know what do you mean. Sorry

4

General / Re: Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 02:48:11 pm »

Try out PR #1135.

Tried and didnt fix it. The pong still has memory leaks.

5

General / Re: Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 02:08:39 pm »

Didnt have at that moment.

I have tried the sfml pong example https://github.com/SFML/SFML/tree/master/examples/pong and the result of valgrind:

==4716== LEAK SUMMARY:
==4716==    definitely lost: 578,736 bytes in 19 blocks
==4716==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==4716==      possibly lost: 42,878,414 bytes in 7,325 blocks
==4716==    still reachable: 155,291 bytes in 785 blocks
==4716==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
 

I was just asking if anyone had the same problem or was that I'm derp or something.

6

General / Memory leaks when upgrading to 2.4.0 from 2.3.2

« on: August 20, 2016, 11:36:14 am »

Have anyone had memory leaks when upgrading from 2.3.2 to 2.4.0?

2.3.2
http://pastebin.com/vU0iXxBg

==8625== LEAK SUMMARY:
==8625==    definitely lost: 60 bytes in 1 blocks
==8625==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==8625==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==8625==    still reachable: 66,350 bytes in 545 blocks
==8625==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
 

2.4.0
http://pastebin.com/wiakFQNT

==9871== LEAK SUMMARY:
==9871==    definitely lost: 2,580,736 bytes in 152 blocks
==9871==    indirectly lost: 2,720 bytes in 18 blocks
==9871==      possibly lost: 42,897,582 bytes in 7,444 blocks
==9871==    still reachable: 155,318 bytes in 774 blocks
==9871==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
 

My OS is Ubuntu 14.04 and I dont have any minimal code.

Its my first post, so sorry if is not the right place to post it or is not formatted well.

Pinkii