Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The DarK'

Pages: [1]
1
General / SFML no grapics window
« on: December 28, 2011, 03:47:32 pm »
Do you have an ATI graphic card ?

It could cause issue with SFML 1.6 (which is not maintened anymore). You can use 2.0.

2
General discussions / Switched times to Uint32 milliseconds in SFML 2
« on: December 25, 2011, 09:35:21 pm »
Quote from: "TomCatFort"
Well micro is still a thousand times better then milis! :D


Indeed !

However, the last git version doesn't provide the micro.


A possible solution, in order to keep the S of SFML, and deliver the exact nanosecond time : provide 2 functions.

GetElapsedTime() / GetFrameTime(); // In float (second), easy to manipulate. (Sprite.Move(ElapedTime * 20, 0) for example).

GetPreciseElapsedTime()  / GetPreciseFrameTime(); // In nanosecond.


So, everybody is happy  :)

3
Feature requests / A better sf::Randomizer
« on: May 13, 2011, 11:44:30 pm »
Quote from: "Laurent"
There's a standard API for random numbers, which is simple enough to use, and for more specific needs there are other APIs available (boost, next C++ standard).


Of course.

However, don't forget the S in SFML. In one line, we can have a random number, easilier than any other ways.

The only necessary improvement is to have the same result on all platform, and wich is not compiler-dependent.

Furthermore, it doesn't burdening SFML  :wink:

4
Graphics / Blurred text at non-integral coordinates
« on: September 19, 2010, 06:07:14 pm »
IMHO I think the best solution is like the smooth filter. SetSmooth/SetPixelPerfect.

Or better, SetSmooth(bool smooth, bool pixelPerfect = false);.

5
General discussions / SFML trends
« on: September 18, 2010, 04:42:43 pm »
Well...

http://www.google.com/trends?q=Sfml,+sdl&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

6
General discussions / SFML 2.0
« on: April 14, 2009, 08:34:35 pm »
Ok, thanks for indication.  :)

7
General discussions / SFML 2.0
« on: April 14, 2009, 08:17:48 pm »
Quote from: "Laurent"
Quote
Also, true static linking builds that require no DLLS to run

If you're talking about libsndfile and OpenAL DLLs, I can't link them statically because they are LGPL.


LGPL don't provide static compilation ??

8
Feature requests / sf::Shape::Line arguments
« on: July 12, 2008, 01:02:16 pm »
Quote from: "Wizzard"
I don't see why we can't provide two versions...



Me too.

Pages: [1]