1
C / Re: A couple missing functions
« on: July 17, 2012, 02:05:31 pm »So this is a polite way of telling me "hurry up, I need these functions"?Hehe, no rush, but it is greatly appreciated
Seriously, I know that I have to fix this before releasing SFML 2.0. I'll try to do it soon.
Quote
Defining multiple variants of the same function is helpful when you can keep the same name, but in C where you have to find a new name for every variant of a function, it quickly becomes confusing and bloated.Well, as I'm testing it I don't need to create vectors, but I don't think its wise to create a function that takes x, y, turns it into a vector, and send it the csfml function where it is destructed and not stored as a vector.
And the C binding exists only to allow other bindings to exist, I don't care about making it user friendly.
And since you're writing yourself a binding, I wonder why you ask for this.