Do you use C++11?

[gsaurus]

It's a keyword.

I know, but I still feel it strange:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/keyword
We have keywords like const_cast and not_eq, and other keywords like constexpr and nullptr. I can somehow understand the difference between the "class" of keywords using '_' and those without, but I don't particularly enjoy it. When I started using smart pointers I always wrote null_ptr by mistake  

[Nexus]

Thank you for all the feedback. The majority (86%) seems to use C++11 already or soon, I didn't expect so much interest

Currently I am reflecting about using C++11 in Thor. For the users, this wouldn't change much (they could write std instead of std::tr1). However, internally, many simplifications or even optimizations become possible. The price to pay is a recent compiler like g++ 4.6 or MSVC++ 2010 (which has existed for 2 years already).

What do you think?

[eXpl0it3r]

As long as the features are equally supported by MSVC++ 2010 and g++ it's fine with me. If it's something else like lambdas which is only supported by MSVC++ 2011 I think it's not okay, since MSVC++ 2011 is only on it's beta stage.

[Lee R]

[...] If it's something else like lambdas which is only supported by MSVC++ 2011 [...].

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd293608.aspx

Ahem...