Er why? It's not like there aren't other nice things in Qt worth using.
That's why I said "only for their resource system".
- Qt is a big dependency -- Windows users
do worry about it, since DLLs are usually very badly managed.
- It requires pre-build steps to create the resource files, which are difficult to integrate into your preferred IDE if you don't have a dedicated plugin. And switching from your preferred IDE to QtCreator just because you use Qt to embed resources into your executable, doesn't seem like a reasonable choice.
- You must learn the Qt's basics before using it. Even if it's just for resources, there are a few tricks to understand.
- Then you have to use their IO classes if you want to be able to load your resources, but you must then convert them to something else so that you can use SFML's loading functions.
- And... well it's a huge multi-purpose C++ framework, it's insane to use it when the required feature can be written with 10 lines of code.
Let's focus on the requested feature, and not into a "Qt / QtCreator is better than X / Y" discussion please
