1
General discussions / Re: Benchmark : SDL vs SFML
« on: August 19, 2012, 01:04:35 pm »
I was under the impression that new SDL was using hardware acceleration like SFML.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
General discussions / Re: Benchmark : SDL vs SFML
« on: August 19, 2012, 11:54:19 am »
Yeah, totaly forgot. Set global V-sync not long ago.
1/ Test : sprites
SDL displayed 428 frames
SFML displayed 1481 frames
--> SFML is 3.5x as fast as SDL
2/ Test : alpha-blended sprites
SDL displayed 114 frames
SFML displayed 1504 frames
--> SFML is 13.2x as fast as SDL
3/ Test : rotating sprites
SDL displayed 67 frames
SFML displayed 1502 frames
--> SFML is 22.4x as fast as SDL
4/ Test : static text
SDL displayed 3648 frames
SFML displayed 27344 frames
--> SFML is 7.5x as fast as SDL
5/ Test : dynamic text
SDL displayed 196 frames
SFML displayed 5559 frames
--> SFML is 28.4x as fast as SDL
Thou interesting, if v-sync was set, why was sdl ignoring it, while sfml wasn't?
1/ Test : sprites
SDL displayed 428 frames
SFML displayed 1481 frames
--> SFML is 3.5x as fast as SDL
2/ Test : alpha-blended sprites
SDL displayed 114 frames
SFML displayed 1504 frames
--> SFML is 13.2x as fast as SDL
3/ Test : rotating sprites
SDL displayed 67 frames
SFML displayed 1502 frames
--> SFML is 22.4x as fast as SDL
4/ Test : static text
SDL displayed 3648 frames
SFML displayed 27344 frames
--> SFML is 7.5x as fast as SDL
5/ Test : dynamic text
SDL displayed 196 frames
SFML displayed 5559 frames
--> SFML is 28.4x as fast as SDL
Thou interesting, if v-sync was set, why was sdl ignoring it, while sfml wasn't?
3
General discussions / Re: Benchmark : SDL vs SFML
« on: August 19, 2012, 03:09:55 am »
Thanks for building new benchmark.
First thing i noticed thou was that program won't start as it lacks libfreetype-6.dll and zlib1.dll. After finding latest versions of them the bench started.
My computer is i5-2500k, 8gb of RAM and GeForce GTX 570, no overcloking. Results were in range, except one unexpected:
1/ Test : sprites
SDL displayed 384 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 0.8x as fast as SDL
2/ Test : alpha-blended sprites
SDL displayed 102 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 3.0x as fast as SDL
3/ Test : rotating sprites
SDL displayed 63 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 4.8x as fast as SDL
4/ Test : static text
SDL displayed 3484 frames
SFML displayed 302 frames
--> SFML is 0.1x as fast as SDL
5/ Test : dynamic text
SDL displayed 138 frames
SFML displayed 302 frames
--> SFML is 2.2x as fast as SDL
First thing i noticed thou was that program won't start as it lacks libfreetype-6.dll and zlib1.dll. After finding latest versions of them the bench started.
My computer is i5-2500k, 8gb of RAM and GeForce GTX 570, no overcloking. Results were in range, except one unexpected:
1/ Test : sprites
SDL displayed 384 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 0.8x as fast as SDL
2/ Test : alpha-blended sprites
SDL displayed 102 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 3.0x as fast as SDL
3/ Test : rotating sprites
SDL displayed 63 frames
SFML displayed 301 frames
--> SFML is 4.8x as fast as SDL
4/ Test : static text
SDL displayed 3484 frames
SFML displayed 302 frames
--> SFML is 0.1x as fast as SDL
5/ Test : dynamic text
SDL displayed 138 frames
SFML displayed 302 frames
--> SFML is 2.2x as fast as SDL
4
General discussions / Re: Benchmark : SDL vs SFML
« on: August 18, 2012, 01:48:10 am »
Now that SFML 2.0 and SDL 1.3 APIs have stabilized it would be interesting to see new benchmark.
5
General discussions / Re: SFML 2.0 RC
« on: April 23, 2012, 09:51:30 am »
Hi! I wanted to try SFML but seeing the state of transition from 1.6 to 2.0 - wanted to ask. Are tutorials on site from 1.6 version up to date with current API? Or should i wait for them to be rewritten?
Pages: [1]