Debug: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault

[fixus971]

Hi,  

I get same strange problem with a my program so try to use debug and back-running go to try debug in samples of SFML.

I get error:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault

in any programs when go to use debug function of CodeBlocks.

I see that problems begin when start to use graph with

Code: [Select]

sf::RenderWindow App(sf::VideoMode(800, 600, 32), "SFML Pong");
Probably is only a case.. I'm not an expert din debug/codeblocks so..

someone can help me please?
I just spent a lot of time for this.

I work on windows with: SFML1.3 / Code::Blocks / Mingw / gdb.exe.

I don't get any problem with simply programs that don't use library:

Code: [Select]

for ( i=1; i<=3; i=i+1 ) { printf("i=%d ",i); }

I can't found documentation about this online.. only a similar problem:
http://forums.comodo.com/bug_reports/conflict_with_gdb_debugger-t21329.0.html;msg147164


Now I make an simple code: new project with this code:

Code: [Select]

#include <SFML/Graphics.hpp>
int main() {
    sf::RenderWindow AppGr;
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
and

Code: [Select]


#include <SFML/Window.hpp>
int main() {
    sf::Window App(sf::VideoMode(640, 480, 32), "SFML Window");
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}


This 2 simple codes have the same problem:
starting debug with initialize variable as sf::RenderWindow or sf::Window
generate SigSegV
if I remove variable init line debug can run property

Now I try other library and found that I haven't any problem
with Sockets sample in debug mode. Any debug function go right.


Thanks for any suggestion.

[Puck]

If possible you might try downloading and installing SFML from scratch. There's no reason that I know of that code should be segfaulting. I'm using the exact same code on the exact same platform (Windows/MingW/Code::Blocks) without any problems, so my best guess is a corrupt library. :?

[fixus971]

Hi Puck.

All SFML programs run well on my PC.
Only when try to use GDB debugger(breakpoints) I get SigSegV.
Do you use that?

Thanks