Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
A PR would be even more appreciated.
I think Hapax points hold. Also, in the "Playing with the window" part of the "Opening and managing a SFML window" tutorial, it readsYes, I agree.QuoteYou can refer to the API documentation for a complete list of sf::Window's functions.because we don't want to discuss every function in the tutorial -- it is intended to give the basic understanding of the system to then be able to use the documentation efficiently.
That being said, I think it would be okay to have something like this added to the tutorial. Would you agree?
The pixelation is currently togglable.It's looking great. Well done. BTW I vote for non-pixelated version!
One problem, though, is that I need a render texture to pixelate but can't use anti-alias on the render texture. This would mean that to use anti-alias, I would have to provide a work around that skips the render texture and draws directly onto the screen
Another problem, too, is that the "quality of the pixels" would determine the level of detail required in the actual textures. If pixelated, lesser textures are needed. If not pixelated, more detail can be added.
See? A dilemma!
The long overdue second path version SFML 2.4.2 has been released!Thanks for the fantastic work!
The biggest changes are regarding context management again, where we fixed some pending issues.
The full list of bugfixes can be found in the changelog: http://www.sfml-dev.org/changelog.php#sfml-2.4.2
Visit http://www.sfml-dev.org/ for download instructions and extensive documentation. We hope this release is useful to you and would love to get some feedback in our forums!
The hasFocus() and requestFocus() methods should not be included in a tutorial about events as they are not events.
If they are to included in a tutorial, it should be the Opening and managing a SFML window tutorial.
Cool! Would one of you provide a fix for https://github.com/SFML/SFML-Website/issues/46, especially with something with a clean licence?
Here's an awesome looking tileset which has really cool license which permits you to distribute it easily:
http://lpc.opengameart.org/static/lpc-style-guide/index.html#
Demo:
If the license is still not too good, I think that having good looking tileset for tutorials is really important. Ugly tilesets can provide some bad feelings about the library/tutorials.however it might also help adding a corresponding pixel editor file so that completely new people to the subjectIsn't a simple .png enough for this? Why create dependency on some editor considering png can be edited with nearly every editor?
This was brought up before; no-one was sure which licence is applied to the image and not sure who created it or couldn't contact its creator. Therefore, sharing this image might be against the limits allowed by the creator.
).
